I feel trapped. I’m going to be having my first child, a daughter, in a few short months and like many other parents I want to introduce her to things that interest me, be it movies, music or, in my case, comics. I don’t want her to feel limited, the way I did, while growing up because she is a girl and should only do girl things. My mother and father were excellent at supporting my interests and it wasn’t them I felt isolated by but by everyone else. I liked playing softball, running around and playing with LEGOs as a child as much as I enjoyed my Barbies and paper dolls. I liked doing these things not because of my sex, but because I had fun and got to play with people I enjoyed being around.
This idea that girls, pink, are only supposed to like one thing, while boys, blue, get to like another based solely on what is between their legs is not new, but it is depressing how prevalent it still is. Even when you go toy shopping the divide is clearly labeled by color what isle you belong in. Boys get superhero toys, things that help hand-eye coordination (LEGOs, etc.), and even toys that show them how to use tools while girls get baby dolls, Barbies that showcase breasts and legs over anything else, and fake supermarket carts with plastic food. If a child really wants to pretend to go shopping for groceries I have absolutely no problem with that. What I do find fault in is when she is advertised at, and market to as if that is the only possibility for her because of her sex.
On the other side, I do realize that this happens for boys too, and I’m saddened when I hear women imply they don’t have a right to complain because boys have it easier. They are bombarded with just as many advertising stereotypes as girls are, they get made fun of for having dolls, not enjoying football or wanting to grow up to be just like daddy. I think progress needs to be made on both sides, but I doubt that will ever actually happen. They are told from a very young age to be a good person of quality you have to be strong and handsome, or have a beautiful face, long hair and large breasts to be happy. This is everywhere, and what is horrible is I see this more in things intended for children than I do for adults.
Let’s look at programming for instance. It isn’t perfect but for older audiences we have a myriad of shows that show women in a positive, non-overly sexed way. Women in popular shows like Castle, House, Grey’s Anatomy, and hell, even shows like Two Broke Girls do a better job of showing women as diverse people that aren’t defined by their “endowments”. Bernadette, Amy and Penny from The Big Bang Theory are also great examples of smart, independent women who are capable in their various ways but are so different from each other. They aren’t stereotypes or caricatures of women, they are more “real” than what you see in many of the cartoons gracing the airwaves of Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network or any other network. Even the shows that come on early Saturday mornings on CBS, ABC and FOX are pretty terrible in their representation of boys and girls. They are one long commercial after the other with no regard to how they affect the children watching.
Perhaps things haven’t aged well, but I have always been crazy over cartoons, and I still am. I loved watching Chowder, Avatar: The Last Airbender, Invader Zim, Animaniacs and many others through my life and when I find a children’s show that handles the characters well I get incredibly excited over it. Most of these shows had a plot, had characters with substance, and were enjoyable to me because they didn’t make me feel isolated. I had characters I could identify with. Gaz loved videogames, wasn’t interested in being girly and handled herself well, and I could see myself with some of those traits and Katara was incredibly strong and competent, though human and made mistakes she learned from. With a few exceptions I hate the random crazy, stupidity of shows like Sponge Bob Square Pants, and Adventure Time. The later fails exceptionally because they are very inorganic and forced with their show’s “quirk”. But I will still give them credit, Princess Bubblegum (I think that’s her name) and Sandy are two girls who are smart and are a positive example for any girls that watch the show.
But then we have shows that lack terribly for girls. Even if they are presented as strong, many female characters that should be capable still have to be rescued. They often have any shining moment stolen away because the pretty much always lead male character has to swoop in and save their lives. This takes the potential that existed within those female characters and cheapens it significantly. It reinforces the idea that no matter how skilled you become, you still can’t do what a boy/man can. I wouldn’t mind so much that this happens if there were alternatives for girls. How many shows, comparatively, exist with a female lead versus male? How many have girls that don’t fall into the stereotype of strong=bitchy? I have very slim pickings for my daughter, but hopefully when she gets old enough to watch TV I’ll have more options.
“It isn’t a big deal.” When I hear this I can’t help but wonder if they’ve ever watched these shows. These are your daughters and sons, and they are bombarded with messages that shape their self worth and character. Parents aren’t the only source for this so it is important to expect more from what you show your children. It is not okay to just sit back and let your child channel surf without even watching one episode of what they love. It is called taking an interest. Watch these programs and see if you don’t notice that many female characters with a brain also come with a rather terse, confrontational, “bitchy” attitude. How often do you see a male character act like a complete ass to others and then is rewarded or treated with a “he’s so cool” regard? How often do you see a character act according to what they like (such as being more effeminate if male or masculine if female) and are they berated for it? I see these things.
I see them in Barbies and Bratz and other toys for girls that show them dressed like cheap hookers and presented as “what girls should be” without many, if any, alternatives. I know there are Doctor, Vet and Teacher Barbies but what about Police Officer Barbie, Detective Barbie, or even Commander Barbie? How advertised are they? If they do exist are they only the collector Barbies, even meant to be played with? Is the idea of a woman being in a position of power so absurd that we can’t even make these toys? Are the only popular options shoved down a little girl’s throat to look like a whore or be an outcast? Many of these toys now come with DVDs that correspond with the type of adventure a young girl is supposed to emulate with the product. Most end in the phrase “Let’s go shopping” or “we can all be princesses”. Why are these the two most popular options? Why did there even have to be a freakin’ DVD in the first place? What happened to imagination or open-ended play? As a child my Barbies were mountain climbers, or just didn’t have an occupation. I acted out stories I wrote in my head between the dolls, but being very young I doubt they were all that great, but I still played and put them in the roles I wanted them in.
And what about comics? I used to love comics as a child. I have several issues of X-Men, Batman and many others and never really minded how the women looked. The fact they had breasts as big as their heads didn’t matter to me because they were still strong women who knew how to fight, and be good people. They had a strong sense of justice and stood up for it, regardless of what they got in return. They were well developed, well rounded characters (no, that was not meant to be a pun or cute or anything) so I could ignore the character design. The problem is when you have female characters in comics that are only there as eye candy, and serve no other purpose.
It is for this reason I’m very disappointed in the new Starfire, but I’m also angry and befuddled at the idea that her past as a sex slave is somehow why she enjoys sex. I know she isn’t human, and therefore not likely to experience things the same way, but that doesn’t mean she’s incapable of feeling the torment and pain of being forced into that kind of role. It makes me think the writer didn’t do any research in regard to what happens to people when they are in that position. I really think it makes light of the victim’s situation and plays into the idea that women love penises, regardless of whose it is. Just give them enough and they’re come to love it? In what universe is this likely? Certainly not this one. This new design is harmful. The writer had such a great opportunity, but squandered it away. The reasons? I have no idea. It just seems like he was too lazy to put in the effort to write a decent character.
As a female comic book artist I look at these images and can’t help but feel tremendously offended. I can draw and write characters that have depth, that have a reason for the things they do, that have a back story that makes sense. I do my research and have very detailed psychological profiles of all my characters. I see this lack of ability and it makes me so mad. I’m not the only writer that does this, yet you don’t see our work in the mainstream. I haven’t been able to dedicate as much time as I like, and this is a large contributor, but many others put all of themselves in their work and don’t even get a proper rejection letter because the publishers just can’t be bothered. This is one of the biggest failures of the industry and it needs to stop. Stop rewarding these terrible writers, and take a chance on someone who’s worth it.
Am I being overly sensitive? How would you know? Most of you who read this have probably never felt what it was like to enjoy things meant for boys, and being looked at like a freak. Most of you didn’t grow up the way I did. I rarely wore makeup or very feminine clothing and was often told that I was inferior, undateable, or ugly for it. My mother once told me, innocently (I know for a fact she didn’t mean to hurt me), that I looked ugly when I cried. I didn’t know how to take this other than if I showed emotion, that I was hurt, that I meant less because as a child I was always told to count I had to be beautiful. I typically don’t feel that way anymore, but every now and then I still often feel inferior for my lack of femininity. Twice in my years with my husband I have felt like he was wasting his time with me because I wasn’t what other women are. I don’t get my nails done, I shop for books and not shoes, I don’t dress in skirts or lovely blouses, and I never subscribed to the notion that my only goal in life was to be a wife and mother. I am only me, and that is all I can offer him. I can offer him my loyalty and devotion, my love and take care of him the best way I can, but because I’m not “pretty” I still occasionally feel like I fail him. This is what years of commercial reinforcement has done to me, and other women who don’t fall into that stereotypical cutout. We are influenced to feel worthless if we aren’t pretty, or feminine, or if we don’t define our lives around having children. I am not taking issue with the women who are truly happy in this role, it is their choice and I want only for their happiness, I am ecstatic about becoming a mother myself, but the rest shouldn’t have to suffer for choosing a different route.
I can talk to my husband, and I know he loves me for every part of who I am, and because of this I feel beautiful in my own way. I may never grace the cover of a magazine, but the one person who’s opinion I care about finds me to be a wonderful, beautiful person and that means more to me than any random person sizing up my worth based off of my breasts, butt, and clothing.
He is a wonderful example of what I would define as a true man. He doesn’t like sports, but knows how to build things. He doesn’t become “overly emotional”, but he shares with me when he wants to. He judges people based off of their actions and who they are rather than what they look like. I understand that many men often develop different than him, and it is honestly for reasons that correlate well with what girls get. He is exactly who he is because of his personality, not sex.
A great example of this correlation is the show How to be a Gentlemen. They took the two extremes of what people consider men and basically have them fight it out, figuratively of course. And more often than not the “masculine” wins. This is what seems to happen most when you have a situation like this. Even if the more feminine man should win you can bet he is made fun of and criticized for it long before he even has a chance. Men are constantly berated for showing their emotions, not watching football, or not treating women like objects. Look at all the images of men being “pimps” and calling all women bitches. This is what is glorified and we wonder why things are still the way they are? I’m in no way saying women or men separately are responsible but change needs to come from both sides. If we want men to respect us more than I think it would be helpful if the good, decent men aren’t alienated, or looked down upon but celebrated for the wonderful guys they are. We can’t make fun of “mannies” or “murses” and expect true workplace equality. If we strait girls want the good men, we should probably stop participating and perpetuating the idea that obnoxious, misogynistic jerk=desirable. Nice guys are fewer, but very much worth it.
I’m not trying to claim that any one sex has it harder. I can’t know that for sure since I’m a woman, I will always identify myself as such and I have no desire for a sex change so I can’t actually experience what it is like to be a man. What I want is for people to expect more from what they buy and watch because what our children learn isn’t just from parents, it is all around us. We don’t have to ban anything. The writers/creators of shows and products just need to show a little more integrity. I can write books for my daughter, but that’s about it. I can’t make TV shows that will inspire her to be a better person, I lack the resources, so I expect those that can to have the self respect enough to put forth the effort to make it better. I was raised to do the best you can in what you do, because otherwise what is the point?
So as a future mother what am I to do? How am I supposed to defend against the overwhelming amount of terrible influences that are going to bombard her? I can only do the best I can and hope that someone else doesn’t make her feel inferior, or that if she’s intelligent it doesn’t matter because she’s “not as smart as a man”. I am making the choice to limit the amount of pink, and “for girls only” items in her life. However, if she wants a Barbie doll, just because she really wants it and not because all her friends do, or because the TV said she had to have one, than that is fine. If she likes pink because she likes it and wants her room that color, that is fine. Honesty, I would love it if she was a scientist, or even a non-crazy female politician, but if she wants to be a house wife, or something of that nature I would still love her, cherish her and hope for nothing but her happiness because what I want her to be more than anything else is exactly who she is, and not what everyone tells her she should be.
Thank you for reading, Ally B.























